Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

₹9.32 Cr Cash Deposit Addition remanded Due to Lack of Verification by Tax Authorities

Case Law Details

Case Name
Tulshidas Chandrabhan Jejurkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement
Tulshidas Chandrabhan Jejurkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The appeal concerns the assessment year 2018–19, where the assessee, an individual, filed a return declaring total income of ₹5,37,110. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under the issue of “large cash deposits in bank account(s).” Notices under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were issued, seeking explanation for the cash deposits. In the absence of any response from the assessee during assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer treated cash deposits amounting to ₹9,32,75,495 as unexplained and added ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *