Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ghanshyam Lal Vs PCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ghanshyam Lal Vs PCIT (ITAT Raipur) No Enquiry on Capital Gains – PCIT’s 263 Revision Upheld for Urban Land Sale Falling Within Bilaspur Municipal Limits Raipur ITAT upheld the revisional order u/s 263, holding that AO’s assessment was erroneous & prejudicial to Revenue. Assessee, a farmer, had filed return declaring Rs.1,54,590/- & claimed exempt agricultural income from sale of alleged agricultural land at Bodri , Bilaspur. During scrutiny, AO made addition only for unexplained cash deposit of Rs.16,10,000/- u/s 68 but completely ignored the sale of three properties aggregating...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930