Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nirmalkunj Sales Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nirmalkunj Sales Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata Quashes Reopening – Notice u/s 148 Void Without Proper Sanction from Pr.CCIT Assessee challenged reassessment order passed pursuant to notice u/s 148 dated 30.07.2022. The notice mentioned prior approval of Pr.CIT-2, Kolkata obtained on 28.07.2022. Based on reassessment, AO made addition of ₹79,00,000 treating cash consideration received from sale of shares as unexplained cash credit. CIT(A) upheld reassessment & addition. Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that reopening was after three years from end of AY 2016-17, hence mandato...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930