Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reassessment merely based on allegation that appellant has PE in India cannot be sustained

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2018 taxguru.in 451
Case Name
Honda Motor Co. Ltd Vs ADIT (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Honda Motor Co. Ltd Vs ADIT (Supreme Court of India)

In the judgment of this Court dated 24th October, 2017 in Assistant Director of Income Tax-I, New Delhi v. M/s. E-Funds IT Solution Inc., Civil Appeal NO.6082 of 2015 and connected matters, it has been held that once arm’s length principle has been satisfied, there can be no further profit attributable to a person even if it has a permanent establishment in India.

Since the impugned notice for the reassessment is based only on the allegation that the appellant(s) has permanent establishment in India, the notice cannot be sustained once arm’s length price procedure has been followed.

Accordingly, the impugned order(s) is set aside and the appeals are allowed.

Learned counsel for the Revenue states that he does not have complete instructions. If the Revenue disputes the above factual position, it will be at liberty to move this Court.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.