This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty Sustained Because Tax Paid Without Return Doesn’t Disclose Income Details
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
No Return u/s 139 & Return Filed Long After Sec.148 Deadline — Explanation 3 to Sec.271(1)(c) Automatically Deems Concealment; Penalty of ₹18.55 Lakh Upheld
In this appeal, Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel challenged the penalty of ₹18,55,865/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12. The Assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹98,50,000/- on 04.03.2011 but did not file the return u/s 139. Based on information received, the Department issued notice u/s 148 on 28.03.2018. Interestingly, the Assessee deposited ₹17,76,14...




