Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty Sustained Because Tax Paid Without Return Doesn’t Disclose Income Details

Case Law Details

Case Name
Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) No Return u/s 139 & Return Filed Long After Sec.148 Deadline — Explanation 3 to Sec.271(1)(c) Automatically Deems Concealment; Penalty of ₹18.55 Lakh Upheld In this appeal, Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel challenged the penalty of ₹18,55,865/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12. The Assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹98,50,000/- on 04.03.2011 but did not file the return u/s 139. Based on information received, the Department issued notice u/s 148 on 28.03.2018. Interestingly, the Assessee deposited ₹17,76,14...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,842

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *