Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) No Return u/s 139 & Return Filed Long After Sec.148 Deadline — Explanation 3 to Sec.271(1)(c) Automatically Deems Concealment; Penalty of ₹18.55 Lakh Upheld In this appeal, Vitthalbhai Ashabhai Patel challenged the penalty of ₹18,55,865/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12. The Assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹98,50,000/- on 04.03.2011 but did not file the return u/s 139. Based on information received, the Department issued notice u/s 148 on 28.03.2018. Interestingly, the Assessee deposited ₹17,76,143/- as tax on 27....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930