Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Palmer Investment Group Ltd (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Palmer Investment Group Ltd (ITAT Bangalore) Penalty Deleted as Issue Becomes Debatable – HC Admission of Quantum Appeal Saves Assessee The ITAT Bangalore upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c), holding that once the High Court admits the quantum appeal on substantial questions of law, the issue becomes debatable and penalty cannot survive. The case involved a non-resident company where substantial transfer pricing adjustment (₹262 crores) was made on sale of shares, which was upheld by the Tribunal. The assessee challenged the quantum before the Karnataka High ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930