Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prataprai Ranpariya Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prataprai Ranpariya Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) The appeal was filed by Assessee against the order of  CIT(A), arising from reassessment proceedings framed u/s 147  for AY 2019-20.  CIT(A) had dismissed the matter ex parte, without discussing the merits of the case. Before the Tribunal,  Assessee contended that he could not represent his case since the notices were delivered on a wrong email ID &  his consultant had failed to cooperate, resulting in non-submission of details before the lower authorities. He argued that the impugned order was a clear violation of the principles of natural jus...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930