Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marappagounder Periasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Marappagounder Periasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Chennai ITAT dealt with a peculiar situation where the CIT(A) had dismissed appeal without adjudication by merely reproducing his earlier order for AY 2014-15. Assessee challenged the CIT(A)’s order, arguing that it was a verbatim copy-paste of AY 2014-15 appellate order, including even the statement of facts & grounds which related to that year & not AY 2013-14. Hence, the appeal was never adjudicated on merits. It was also pointed out that the Assessee had already paid more than 20% of the disputed demand. Departmental Representative f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031