Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marappagounder Periasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Marappagounder Periasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Chennai ITAT dealt with a peculiar situation where the CIT(A) had dismissed appeal without adjudication by merely reproducing his earlier order for AY 2014-15. Assessee challenged the CIT(A)’s order, arguing that it was a verbatim copy-paste of AY 2014-15 appellate order, including even the statement of facts & grounds which related to that year & not AY 2013-14. Hence, the appeal was never adjudicated on merits. It was also pointed out that the Assessee had already paid more than 20% of the disputed demand. Departmental Representative f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930