This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Loose Sheets + Retracted Statement Not Enough for 69A On-Money Addition: ITAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Gnanaguru Lavanya (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-21
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Gnanaguru Lavanya (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT Chennai Deletes On-Money Addition u/s 69A; Third-Party Loose Sheets Retracted Statement Held Insufficient
The Chennai Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions made u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for AY 2020-21, relating to alleged “on-money” receipts from sale of land. The Tribunal held that the additions were based solely on uncorroborated loose sheets and notepads seized from a third-party premises, which neither bore the assessee’s handwriting/signature nor established payer, payee, nature,...





