Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suraiya Begum Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suraiya Begum Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) CBDT Instruction mandated that in all demonetisation cash deposit cases, notices to non-filers had to be issued by 31.12.2017- Late Notice Makes Assessment Void Ab Initio – ITAT Lucknow ITAT Lucknow   quashed the assessment framed u/s 144 r.w.s. 69A on the ground that the statutory notice u/s 142(1) was issued beyond the prescribed deadline as per CBDT instructions. Assessee had deposited Rs. 10,00,000/- in specified bank notes during the demonetisation period & Rs. 3,08,517/- during the year in her Bank of Baroda account. AO, on failure of compl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930