Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Restores Appeal as CIT(A) Failed to Examine Claim That Bank Account Did Not Belong to Assessee

Case Law Details

Case Name
Harish Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Harish Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh, arose from the order dated 5 September 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, for AY 2017-18. The assessee challenged the confirmation of an addition of ₹16,88,000 under Section 69A as unexplained money, estimation of income of ₹19,896 at 1% of credit card transactions amounting to ₹19,89,621, application of Section 115BBE, and the alleged denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The assessee had originally filed a return declaring t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,532

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *