Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gyasuddin Mohammad Ansari Vs ITO (ITAT Patna)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Gyasuddin Mohammad Ansari Vs ITO (ITAT Patna)

The Patna DB Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (virtual court) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2023-24, holding that the CIT(A) erred in arbitrarily estimating the indexed cost of acquisition at ₹20 lakh without assigning any cogent basis.

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished the Minimum Valuation Register (MV

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031