Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT quashes Reassessment for want of valid Section 151(ii) Sanction

Case Law Details

Case Name
Chandrakant Viththal Bhopi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
Chandrakant Viththal Bhopi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT quashes reassessment for want of valid sanction u/s 151(ii) – Approval by PCIT Instead of PCCIT/CCIT held invalid – When notice issued beyond 3 years– Entire 148 proceedings set aside; Interest u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act (₹2.60 Cr) taxability issue rendered academic Assessee, an individual, received ₹2.60 crore as interest on enhanced compensation u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of compulsory acquisition of rural agricultural land. He did not file a return for A.Y. 2016-17. On the basis of Form 26AS inform...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,494

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *