Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrakant Viththal Bhopi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrakant Viththal Bhopi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT quashes reassessment for want of valid sanction u/s 151(ii) – Approval by PCIT Instead of PCCIT/CCIT held invalid – When notice issued beyond 3 years– Entire 148 proceedings set aside; Interest u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act (₹2.60 Cr) taxability issue rendered academic Assessee, an individual, received ₹2.60 crore as interest on enhanced compensation u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of compulsory acquisition of rural agricultural land. He did not file a return for A.Y. 2016-17. On the basis of Form 26AS inform...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930