Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs RBA Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs RBA Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Old Law, New Date; Can’t Beat the Clock- Dispatch Delay Proves Fatal-Notice dated in March but served in April- Reassessment Invalid-  ITAT Delhi Quashes ₹48 Cr Reassessment – ITAT Delhi Holds Reassessment Void Ab Initio Revenue filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A) deleting additions made u/s 68 on account of unsecured loans aggregating to ₹48.30 crores received from group concerns.  Assessee, in turn, raised a legal plea under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules, contending that the reassessment itself was invalid since the notice issued u/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930