Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Substantial Justice Overrides Limitation — 182-Day Delay Condoned; Ex-parte Dismissal by CIT(A) Set Aside

The Tribunal held that the assessee had established sufficient and bona fide cause for the delay of 182 days in filing the appeal, noting that he was a non-resident and was genuinely unaware of the reassessment proceedings culminating in an ex-parte order under section 144 of the Act  . It was observed that there was no mala fide intention or deliberate inact

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031