Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Substantial Justice Overrides Limitation — 182-Day Delay Condoned; Ex-parte Dismissal by CIT(A) Set Aside The Tribunal held that the assessee had established sufficient and bona fide cause for the delay of 182 days in filing the appeal, noting that he was a non-resident and was genuinely unaware of the reassessment proceedings culminating in an ex-parte order under section 144 of the Act  . It was observed that there was no mala fide intention or deliberate inaction, and the Revenue failed to place any counter-affidavit or material to rebut...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031