Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Condoned 182-Day Delay as Substantial Justice Prevails Over Limitation

Case Law Details

Case Name
Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Santosh Kumar Ramlaxman Yadav Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Substantial Justice Overrides Limitation — 182-Day Delay Condoned; Ex-parte Dismissal by CIT(A) Set Aside The Tribunal held that the assessee had established sufficient and bona fide cause for the delay of 182 days in filing the appeal, noting that he was a non-resident and was genuinely unaware of the reassessment proceedings culminating in an ex-parte order under section 144 of the Act  . It was observed that there was no mala fide intention or deliberate inaction, and the Revenue failed to place any counter-affidavit or ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

Sayyad Sadak
Name: Sayyad Sadak
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Sayyad Sadak & Associates
Location: Hyderabad, Telangana
Articles Published: 56

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *