ITAT Deletes Section Addition for Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained Through Cash Flow Statement
Case Law Details
Case Name : CSV Renraj (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CSV Renraj (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
In CSV Renraj (HUF) Vs ITO, the ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted an addition of Rs.9,40,000 made under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in relation to cash deposits during the demonetisation period.
The appeal was filed against the order dated 30.11.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, for Assessment Year 2017-18, which had confirmed the addition under Section 69A. The assessee also filed a petition seeking condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

