Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Padma Pharmaceuticals Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Padma Pharmaceuticals Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Non-speaking Order Violates Section 250(6) – ITAT Bangalore Restores Case for Fresh Decision Assessee challenged the NFAC order confirming additions without adequate reasoning. The appeal was delayed by 238 days, for which condonation was sought on the ground that the managing partner handling tax matters was unwell. Supporting affidavit & medical records were filed. The Department argued that the firm had multiple partners who could have pursued the matter. However, the Tribunal held that illness of the managing partner constituted a reason...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031