Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Allows Additional Evidence in ₹1.11 Cr Cash Deposit Case of Widow

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 12883
Case Name
Smt. Padmalatha Vojjala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement

Smt. Padmalatha Vojjala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Unexplained cash deposits of widow remanded: ITAT admits additional evidence on sale of inherited assets

Hyderabad  ITAT, in  set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, after admitting additional evidence under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules.

The Assessee, a widow, had deposited cash of ₹1.11 crore in her bank account but had not filed a return u/s 139. The case was reopened u/s 147, and the AO treated the cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, rejecting the explanation that the amounts represented sale proceeds of inherited agricultural land and gold jewellery received from her father. The CIT(A), NFAC, confirmed the addition for want of documentary evidence.

Before the Tribunal, the Assessee produced additional evidence, including Adangal/Pahani extracts, receipts for cash received from alleged purchasers, and an unregistered agreement relating to sale of agricultural land, explaining that these documents could not be produced earlier due to genuine difficulties. The ITAT held that the evidence was crucial to the core issue and admitted it under Rule 29.

However, the Tribunal noticed serious inconsistencies, including mismatch in dates between the agreement and cash receipts, timing of cash receipts vis-à-vis the relevant financial year, absence of registered sale deeds, and lack of verification of purchasers’ identity and creditworthiness. It also emphasised the need to examine the chain of title, i.e., inheritance from the father to the Assessee and the subsequent alleged transfer to purchasers.

In view of these unresolved factual aspects, the ITAT set aside the findings of the AO and CIT(A) and restored the issue to the AO for de novo examination, directing verification of purchasers, reconciliation of dates, and scrutiny of inheritance and transfer records, with a speaking order to be passed after granting due opportunity to the Assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT HYDERABAD

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,298

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.