Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Padmalatha Vojjala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Smt. Padmalatha Vojjala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Unexplained cash deposits of widow remanded: ITAT admits additional evidence on sale of inherited assets

Hyderabad  ITAT, in  set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, after admitting additional evidence under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules.

The Assessee, a widow, had deposited Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT-263 Upheld for Inadequate Inquiry in Search Assessment: ITAT Mumbai Section 69C Not Invokable: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case Section 54 Deduction Allowed Even If Original Return Was Not Filed: ITAT Mumbai No Section 271AAA Penalty Where Search Disclosure Was Proper: ITAT Kolkata Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031