Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dinesh Babu Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dinesh Babu Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO Claimed No Return Was Filed, Assessee Proved It Was- Reopening on Wrong Facts—Delhi ITAT Quashes 147 Assessment Appeal was delayed by 108 days. Assessee filed affidavit & medical records. Tribunal held that delay was bona fide & condoned it. On merits, Assessee challenged validity of reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148. AO reopened assessment on the premise that no return of income for AY 2008-09 was filed & that investment of Rs.63,00,000/- in property was unexplained. Assessee demonstrated that he had filed return on 26.12.2008 disclosing inco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930