Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjitha Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sanjitha Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Affidavits Trigger AO’s Duty to Verify — Bangalore ITAT Remands ₹71.23 Lakh 69A Addition in Cash Property Purchase Case The Bangalore ITAT (B Bench) allowed the appeal of Ms. Sanjitha Reddy for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the AO, holding that once the Assessee furnishes affidavits explaining source of cash, the AO cannot make an addition u/s 69A without first conducting proper verification of the donors. The case related to AY 2016-17, where the AO reopened assessment u/s 148 on the basis of information that the Assessee had purc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031