Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjitha Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjitha Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Affidavits Trigger AO’s Duty to Verify — Bangalore ITAT Remands ₹71.23 Lakh 69A Addition in Cash Property Purchase Case The Bangalore ITAT (B Bench) allowed the appeal of Ms. Sanjitha Reddy for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the AO, holding that once the Assessee furnishes affidavits explaining source of cash, the AO cannot make an addition u/s 69A without first conducting proper verification of the donors. The case related to AY 2016-17, where the AO reopened assessment u/s 148 on the basis of information that the Assessee had purc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930