Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkatesh Srinivas Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Venkatesh Srinivas Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Documents Filed Before AO Ignored—Tribunal Orders De-Novo Hearing- Ex-Parte NFAC Order Set Aside – Assessee Gets Fresh Chance on ₹3.10 Cr 54F Claim Assessee appealed against CIT(A)/NFAC order dated 20.03.2024 which dismissed the appeal ex parte. The matter related to disallowance of exemption u/s 54F where AO restricted claim to Rs.40,00,000/- as against Assessee’s claim of Rs.3,50,58,569/-, resulting in addition of Rs.3,10,58,569/-. Assessee explained delayed filing of the present appeal (delay of 267 days) through a detailed affidavit. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930