Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Siva Madhavi Garapati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Siva Madhavi Garapati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad ITAT Upholds Reopening Beyond 3 Years Though Final Addition Fell Below ₹50 Lakhs – Jurisdiction Tested on Information Available at Reopening Stage The Hyderabad ITAT held that validity of reopening u/s 148 must be tested based on the material available with the Assessing Officer at the stage of initiation of reassessment proceedings and not on the basis of the final additions ultimately made in the assessment order. In this case, the assessee argued that since the final surviving addition was only ₹10.08 lakh cash deposits, reopenin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930