Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Kumar Badure Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Kumar Badure Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad ITAT Quashes Reassessment: No Notice Under Section 143(2), Entire Assessment Held Void The Hyderabad ITAT quashed the reassessment framed under sections 147/144/144B, holding that the Assessing Officer could not complete the reassessment without issuing a mandatory notice under section 143(2) after the assessee had filed a return in response to the notice under section 148. The assessee had filed a return declaring nil income pursuant to the reopening notice, but the Assessing Officer ignored the return and proceeded to make an addition of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gross Profit Cannot Be Estimated Without Rejecting Books: Bangalore ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Lack of Section 151(ii) Approval: Hyderabad ITAT Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031