Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sobha Chand Bhansali (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sobha Chand Bhansali (ITAT Kolkata) Finance Broker, Not Financier: Only Brokerage Taxable -No Evidence, No Addition- ITAT Rejects Rs.20-Crore Search Disclosure Theory- Search Addition Without Seized Material Unsustainable Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s orders restricting additions in block assessments framed u/s 153A pursuant to search on 03.02.2017. AO assessed large undisclosed income solely on the basis of an alleged disclosure of Rs.20 crores said to have been made by Assessee before Investigation Wing. Assessee denied making such disclosure, retracted immediately after receiv...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930