Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : New Saha Dyers And Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
New Saha Dyers And Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained from Books: ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition Despite ITS Mismatch The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT dealt with an appeal arising from addition made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period for AY 2017-18. The Assessing Officer had treated cash deposits as unexplained under section 68, relying primarily on ITS data, initially making an addition of about ₹1.48 crore, while the CIT(A) enhanced the addition to ₹3.45 crore based solely on ITS figures. Before the Tribunal, the assessee dem...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031