Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : New Saha Dyers And Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
New Saha Dyers And Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained from Books: ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition Despite ITS Mismatch The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT dealt with an appeal arising from addition made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period for AY 2017-18. The Assessing Officer had treated cash deposits as unexplained under section 68, relying primarily on ITS data, initially making an addition of about ₹1.48 crore, while the CIT(A) enhanced the addition to ₹3.45 crore based solely on ITS figures. Before the Tribunal, the assessee dem...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031