This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delhi HC Stayed Demand Under Section 143(1) Due to Double Disallowance Error
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Portronics Digital Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2024-25
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Portronics Digital Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
The petitioner challenged an intimation dated 14.12.2025 issued under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2024–25, raising a demand of ₹1.37 crore. The petitioner contended that expenses amounting to ₹4.26 crore had already been added back while filing the return, but despite furnishing a clarification in response to a notice dated 07.03.2025, the demand was raised without considering the reply, resulting in double disallowance. The Revenue submitted that the intimation was appealabl...
Author Info
