Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sindhi Educational Society Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sindhi Educational Society Vs PCIT (Madras High Court) Madras High Court: Delay in Filing Form 10 Must Be Condoned—Substantive Section 11 Exemption Cannot Be Denied for Technical Lapse The Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by M/s. Sindhi Educational Society (Madras) and set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner rejecting condonation of delay in filing Form 10 under section 119(2)(b) for AY 2015–16. The petitioner-trust, registered under section 12AA, had filed its return of income and audit report in Form 10B within the due date, but filed Form 10 belatedly with a d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930