Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haribhakti & Co. LLP Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haribhakti & Co. LLP Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Allows Employees’ PF Deduction for COVID-Period Delays Despite Checkmate Ruling The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal of Haribhakti & Co. LLP for AY 2021-22 and deleted the adjustment of ₹15,72,131 made towards delayed deposit of employees’ Provident Fund (PF) contribution under section 36(1)(va). The adjustment was made during CPC processing under section 143(1) on the ground that employees’ PF contributions were deposited beyond the due dates prescribed under the PF Act. The asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930