Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinivasulu Metri Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Srinivasulu Metri Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Suspension Is Not Seizure — Bangalore ITAT Holds Closing Stock Cannot Be Taken at Nil; Matter Remanded for Fresh Valuation The Bangalore ITAT (A Bench) allowed the Assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the issue back to the AO, holding that mere suspension of mining activity does not amount to seizure or confiscation of stock, and therefore closing stock could not be valued at NIL. The Assessee, engaged in mining, claimed loss of closing stock of ₹1.32 crore on the ground that iron ore stock was seized/impounded following suspe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930