Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deepak Kumar Vs CPC (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Deepak Kumar Vs CPC (ITAT Kolkata) One Mistake in 3CD = ₹41 Lakh Tax? ITAT Says: “Not So Fast… Hear the Assessee First!”- A clerical mistake in Form 3CD cannot lead to addition without hearing the assessee– substance prevails over form, & justice requires a fresh examination on merits Assessee was a civil contractor operating under the proprietorship of Shivshakti Constructions & had filed his return of income at ₹9.59 lakh for A.Y. 2017-18. However, the CPC, Bengaluru processed the return u/s 143(1) & made huge adjustments based solely on the figures reported in Fo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031