Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Kumar Chaurasiya Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sandeep Kumar Chaurasiya Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) CIT(A) cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution – Even if Assessee defaults, appeal must be decided on merits – ITAT Lucknow Remands Case for Speaking Order Assessee filed return declaring ₹1,76,989/-. AO framed assessment ex parte u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/155B determining income at ₹14,06,210/- after making addition of ₹12,30,000/- as unexplained money u/s 69A. The order was passed. On appeal, CIT(A) too dismissed the case for non-prosecution, again ex parte, without addressing merits. Tribunal observed that both assessment & appella...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031