Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Annamalai Finance Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH In the instant case, learned counsel for the Revenue is not in a position to demonstrate or satisfy us that due to the change of accounting method adopted by the respondent/ assessee , which is permissible in law as per the ratio laid down in (i) CIT Vs Match well Electrical (I.) Ltd. (2003) 263 ITR 227 (Bom) and (ii) Hela Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (2003) 263 ITR 129 (Cal), the Revenue suffered any loss or such a change of methodology attracts tax evasion. Concededly, there is no finding to that effect in the assessment order or in the order of the Commissioner of Income  T...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930