Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rakesh Divedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rakesh Divedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) “Yes, I Am Satisfied’ Is Not Sanction: ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Mechanical Approval under Section 151 The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2009-10 and quashed the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that the sanction granted under section 151 was mechanical and without application of mind. In this case, the assessment was reopened under section 147 on the basis of alleged unexplained cash deposits of ₹5.20 crore, and additions were ultimately sustained on a peak credit basis by the CIT(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930