This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bona Fide Claim Under Newly Introduced Section 71(3A) Saves Assessee from Penalty Under Section 270A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Uday Garudachar Bindiganavale Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Uday Garudachar Bindiganavale Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Bona Fide Claim Under Newly Introduced Section 71(3A) Saves Assessee from Penalty Under Section 270A
The Bangalore ITAT deleted a penalty of ₹5.67 lakh levied under section 270A for under-reporting of income, holding that the assessee had furnished a bona fide explanation and had disclosed all material facts relating to the computation of income. The Tribunal observed that a genuine mistake arising from lack of awareness of a newly introduced provision cannot automatically attract penalty.
The assessee had claimed set-off of the entire lo...





