This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Payment to Trustees Alone Doesn’t Violate Section 13(1)(c): ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bantval Sulochana Madhava Shenoi Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Bantval Sulochana Madhava Shenoi Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore)
Bengaluru ITAT: Payment to Trustees Does Not Automatically Violate Section 13(1)(c); Reasonableness Must Be Examined
The Bengaluru ITAT held that payment of remuneration or honorarium to trustees is not, by itself, a violation of section 13(1)(c). The real issue is whether the remuneration paid to specified persons is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the services actually rendered. In this case, a charitable trust running Kamakshi Hospital, Mysuru, paid ₹20.50 lakh as honorarium to its Man...






