Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Chirania Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Chirania Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Bangalore ITAT Deletes ₹1.13 Crore Cash Deposit Addition; Mere Suspicion Cannot Override Accepted Books The Bangalore ITAT deleted an addition of ₹1.13 crore made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE, holding that once the assessee’s books of account reflected sufficient cash balances and the Revenue failed to prove that such cash had been utilized elsewhere, the cash deposits could not be treated as unexplained merely on the basis of suspicion or human probabilities. The assessee had deposited ₹1.29 crore in bank accounts during demone...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031