Accepted Sales Sufficient; Debtor Confirmations Not Mandatory: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Additions
Case Law Details
Case Name : Umabayi Gamanagatti Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umabayi Gamanagatti Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Bangalore ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Additions; Confirmations from Debtors Not Mandatory When Sales Are Accepted
The Bangalore ITAT in Umabayi Gamanagatti (through Legal Heir) v. ITO deleted additions of ₹4.50 lakh and ₹6.11 lakh arising from cash deposits during the demonetisation period. The assessee, a petrol and diesel trader, had explained that the cash deposits represented amounts recovered from sundry debtors against sales already recorded in the books of account.
During assessment, the Assessing Officer questioned cash deposits made duri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

