Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Savita Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Savita Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi) AY 2015-16 Reopening Time-Barred: TOLA Extension Not Available – Revenue Appeal Dismissed Delhi ITAT    held that reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015-16 were barred by limitation, as benefit of TOLA extension is not available for this assessment year. Though the Assessee had succeeded before NFAC on merits of addition u/s 68 relating to alleged bogus entries, Revenue carried the matter in appeal. Assessee, by way of Rule 27 application, raised an additional legal ground challenging the very jurisdiction of reopening on the ground of limitation...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930