Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Savita Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ITO Vs Savita Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi) AY 2015-16 Reopening Time-Barred: TOLA Extension Not Available – Revenue Appeal Dismissed Delhi ITAT    held that reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015-16 were barred by limitation, as benefit of TOLA extension is not available for this assessment year. Though the Assessee had succeeded before NFAC on merits of addition u/s 68 relating to alleged bogus entries, Revenue carried the matter in appeal. Assessee, by way of Rule 27 application, raised an additional legal ground challenging the very jurisdiction of reopening on the ground of limitation...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031