Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Piyush Subodhbhai Jhaveri (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Piyush Subodhbhai Jhaveri (ITAT Ahmedabad) Conclusion: Where temporary loans received and repaid through banking channels, with identity and creditworthiness of lender proved, the sa,e could not be treated as unexplained cash credits under Section 68. Reliance on third-party statements without cross-examination was invalid. Held: Assessee was an individual engaged in share broking and securities trading through his proprietary concern M/s. Shri Parshwa Finance, had received temporary loan of ₹1.85 crore from M/s. Prraneta Industries Ltd. (PIL) during A.Y. 2010–11, repaid fully in ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930