Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Punjab and Haryana HC Grants Bail in Alleged ₹156 Crore GST Evasion Case

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13835
Case Name
Navinder Singh Saiidev Vs Directorate General of Gst Intelligence (Punjab and Haryana High court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Navinder Singh Saiidev Vs Directorate General of Gst Intelligence (Punjab and Haryana High court)

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed two first petitions for regular bail arising from an investigation into an alleged online money-gaming network. The Directorate General of GST Intelligence alleged that the petitioners used sham or non-functional companies, payment gateways and bank accounts to route gaming receipts while declaring only commission in GST returns. It estimated the resulting GST evasion at approximately ₹156 crore. According to the department, Manish Kumar Aggarwal was the CEO of M/s. Dhanik Traders (OPC) Private Limited, which acted as the network’s central payment hub, while Narinder Singh Sahdev was its director and the proprietor of M/s Vansh Enterprises. These were allegations before the Court, not findings made on the merits of the prosecution.

The petitioners submitted that the investigation was complete, the relevant documents had been seized, and the proposed evidence was principally digital or documentary. They disputed the weight of WhatsApp chats and co-accused persons’ disclosure statements and argued that their continued detention served no purpose. The department opposed bail, citing the scale of the alleged evasion, the petitioners’ asserted central roles and the network of dummy entities.

The Court noted that the petitioners had been in custody since 01.05.2026, for four months and two days; the alleged offences carried a maximum imprisonment of five years and were triable by a Magistrate. It also noted that the investigation had concluded, the proposed evidence was documentary, the witnesses were officials, and an early conclusion of the trial appeared unlikely. Referring to decisions granting bail in comparable GST prosecutions, the Court held that further detention would serve no useful purpose, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,062

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.