Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hitech CNC Engineering Vs Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax) (FAC)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hitech CNC Engineering Vs Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax) (FAC)

In a recent judgement dated 3rd June 2025, the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, condoned a delay of 285 days in filing a GST appeal, reaffirming the judiciary’s focus on substantive justice over procedural technicalities.

Background of the Case:

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech CNC Engineering, received an ex parte summary order in DRC-07 dated 25.07.2

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a qualified Chartered Accountant with my experience in tax litigation matters both Income Tax , at an earlier age of 24 I have started representing before CIT(A) & ITAT and have been successful in providing relief to my clients , I have a vast knowledge regarding Futures & Options Trans View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Physical Notice of Hearing by CIT(A), ITAT remanded matter back to CIT(A) for fresh Adjudication GSTR-1 can be amended even after the due date is crossed: Orissa High Court Sec 54 & 54F exemptions aren’t just for Property Owners: Here’s How you and your spouse/Legal Heirs can benefit Name of concerned AO can’t be reflected in notice issued u/s 148 in faceless manner: HC Moonlighting Income: Income Tax Return filing guide for Moonlighters View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031