This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
GSTR-3B & GSTR-1 Discrepancies are Grounds for Appeal, Not Errors Apparent on Record
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vishaka Exports Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vishaka Exports Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
In the case of Vishaka Exports vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), the Madras High Court deliberated on the issue of whether discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 forms qualify as “errors apparent on the face of the record” and whether they can be rectified under Section 161 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TN-G&ST Act).
Background: Vishaka Exports, the petitioner, challenged an order dated June 22, 2022, issued by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 73 of the...
Author Info
