Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Disclosure of Bank Details Quashed: Calcutta HC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13963
Case Name
Joydeb Karmakar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Joydeb Karmakar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

SEO Title: GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Disclosure of Bank Details Quashed: Calcutta High Court

Summary: The Calcutta High Court dealt with a writ petition challenging an order dated 16.06.2025 by which the petitioner’s registration under the WBGST Act, 2017 / CGST Act, 2017 had been cancelled for non-submission of bank details. The petitioner expressed willingness to comply with the GST law by paying outstanding tax together with applicable interest, late fees, penalties and fine and contended that non-revocation of registration would seriously prejudice his livelihood and cause financial hardship. He relied upon Kanaklal Sutradhar Vs. State of West Bengal, in which the Court had adopted a compliance-oriented approach to cancellation of GST registration, and Basudeb Karmakar Vs. The Superintendent of CGST and CX, Range VIII, BBD Bag II Division, Kolkata North Commissionerate and Ors, which recognised that cancellation of GST registration has serious civil consequences and disables an assessee from carrying on business.

The petitioner explained that at the time of registration he had disclosed a bank account jointly held with his elder brother, but after differences arose between them they separated and opened separate accounts, which change was not informed to the GST authorities. The CGST authorities opposed the petition, pointing out that a letter dated 11.02.2025 seeking clarification regarding multiple GST registrations under a single bank account remained unanswered; consequently, a show cause notice dated 07.03.2025 was issued for cancellation under Rule 21 Clause D for violation of Rule 10A. They further submitted that the petitioner had not preferred an appeal against the cancellation order and had delayed approaching the Court.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 21,563

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.