Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priya Tiles and Interiors Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No.12682 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/06/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Priya Tiles and Interiors Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (madras High Court)

The case of Priya Tiles and Interiors vs Deputy State Tax Officer revolves around a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitioner, Priya Tiles and Interiors, challenges an original tax order dated December 30, 2023, on the grounds of not being provided a fair opportunity to contest the tax demand on its merits.

The petitioner claims they were unable to respond to the show cause notice or participate in personal hearings due to various personal difficulties. They assert that the proceedings violated Rule 88C of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules. Despite these allegations, the petitioner has agreed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for the case to be remanded.

Mr. T. N. C. Kaushik, the learned Additional Government Pleader representing the respondent, points out that the impugned order was issued after a notice in Form ASMT-10 and a subsequent show cause notice. He further contends that Rule 88C is not applicable to this case.

Court’s Analysis:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031