This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Simultaneous appeal u/s. 35-G(2)(a) and application u/s. 35-C(2) not tenable: Compost import for consuming judicial time
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sanvijay Rolling And Engineering Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sanvijay Rolling And Engineering Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/- for each application for consuming judicial time of court for no valid reason since appellant simultaneously filed appeal u/s. 35-G(2)(a) and application u/s. 35-C(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Facts- The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant. Notably, sub-section (2) of section 35-G provides that the party aggrieved by an order passed by the appellate tribunal may file appeal to the High Court within a period of 180 days from the date on wh...





