Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Prior to 17th March 2012 No liability to pay interest if credit wrongly taken reversed before utilization

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2012 taxguru.in 1970
Case Name
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Pearl Insulation Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

Commissioner of Central Excise

v.

Pearl Insulation Ltd.

C.E.A. NO. 33 OF 2011

MARCH 2, 2012

JUDGMENT

N. Kumar, J. – This appeal is filed by the Revenue challenging the order passed by the Tribunal Pearl Insultations (P.) Ltd. v. CCE 2012 (280) ELT 559 (Trib. – Bang.) holding that when the Assessee reversed the entire amount attributable to the credit taken, which were utilized in exempted products and in fact not utilized the amount of Cenvat credit, there is no liability to pay interest.

In fact, this Court had an occasion to consider the said question in the case of CCE&ST v. Bill Forge (P.) Ltd. [2012] 34 STT 92 has held, interest is compensatory in character and is imposed on an assessee who has withheld payment of any tax as and when it is due and payable. The levy of interest is on the actual amount, which is withheld and the extent of delay in paying the tax from the due date. The interest cannot be claimed from the date of wrong availment of CENVAT credit and that the interest would be payable from the date CENVAT credit is taken or utilized wrongly.

2. In that view of the matter, we do not see any merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.