Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs INU Exports Private Limited (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 1523 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/10/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs Vs INU Exports Private Limited (CESTAT Bangalore)

Introduction: The Commissioner of Customs appealed against INU Exports Private Limited in the CESTAT Bangalore. The case revolved around the delayed drawal of samples and its effect on the carotene level in imported vegetable oil. The Customs Revenue Laboratory’s test report was questioned in this context.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Import and Classification: INU Exports Private Limited imported edible oil (palmolein) and filed Into Bond Bills of Entry under prior entry for customs warehouse storage. They claimed classification under Chapter Subheading 15111000 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and sought benefits under Notification No.21/2002.

2. Delay in Sample Testing: The imported goods were warehoused while awaiting a test report from the Customs Revenue Laboratory in Cochin. The delay in obtaining the test report was a critical factor in this case.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031