Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Vs Kaveri Seed Company Ltd (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Vs Kaveri Seed Company Ltd (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that merely because some parts were imported separately and cleared under a separate Bill of Entry (BOE), the department cannot contend that the goods cannot be classified under CTH 8437. Goods classifiable under CTH 8437 as order placed for supply would be complete only by including the goods imported vide both Bills of Entry.

Facts- The respondents imported 2 nos. of seed pr

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Raghav Singhal says:

    Good-after Noon Madam,

    Can you provide me the Public Notice 91/1987 as referred in your article. It will be a grate help.

    Thanks

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to Raghav Singhal

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031