Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Archive

Courts: Supreme Court of India

3,663 articles
Income TaxDividend income derived by assessee from a company in Malaysia not liable to be taxed in the hands of the assessee in India under any of the provisions of the Act – SC
Income Tax

Dividend income derived by assessee from a company in Malaysia not liable to be taxed in the hands of the assessee in India under any of the provisions of the Act – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyNo Penalty in case of interpretational nature – Supreme Court
Excise Duty

No Penalty in case of interpretational nature – Supreme Court

TG Team15 years ago
Corporate LawNew partners can not be held guilty for cheque issued by old partners – SC
Corporate Law

New partners can not be held guilty for cheque issued by old partners – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Corporate LawSC upholds tax and penalty on Multi System Operators
Corporate Law

SC upholds tax and penalty on Multi System Operators

TG Team15 years ago
Corporate LawEarnest money forfeited as per terms of tender for not entering into contract can not be refunded – SC
Corporate Law

Earnest money forfeited as per terms of tender for not entering into contract can not be refunded – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Income TaxCompensation to be awarded should not be measured by the nature, location or degree of the injury, but rather by the extent or degree of the incapacity resulting from the injury – SC
Income Tax

Compensation to be awarded should not be measured by the nature, location or degree of the injury, but rather by the extent or degree of the incapacity resulting from the injury – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Custom DutyCCE Vs. M/s. Living Media India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court
Custom Duty

CCE Vs. M/s. Living Media India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyProcess of lifting water is incidental to manufacture ; Supreme Court decision prevails over Board Circular – SC
Excise Duty

Process of lifting water is incidental to manufacture ; Supreme Court decision prevails over Board Circular – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyExcise Duty – Under Section 35C(2) CESTAT cannot altogether take a different view in law and it cannot reappreciate evidence
Excise Duty

Excise Duty – Under Section 35C(2) CESTAT cannot altogether take a different view in law and it cannot reappreciate evidence

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyHonest mistake committed in maintenance of stock register can not be treated as fraud or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts – SC
Excise Duty

Honest mistake committed in maintenance of stock register can not be treated as fraud or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyClandestine removal of excisable goods can not be denied by the company if MD of the company voluntarily came forward to sort out the issue and to pay the Excise duty – SC
Excise Duty

Clandestine removal of excisable goods can not be denied by the company if MD of the company voluntarily came forward to sort out the issue and to pay the Excise duty – SC

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyCost of packing of motor cycles cleared to Depot to be included in assessable value for Excise Duty Valuation  – Supreme Court
Excise Duty

Cost of packing of motor cycles cleared to Depot to be included in assessable value for Excise Duty Valuation – Supreme Court

TG Team15 years ago
Income TaxWhen assessee mistakenly offers to tax interest income and also pays tax on such income, assessee should make rectification  and /or waiver petition
Income Tax

When assessee mistakenly offers to tax interest income and also pays tax on such income, assessee should make rectification and /or waiver petition

TG Team15 years ago
Excise DutyWhether  Iron and Steel structures manufactured and used captively in the factory for installation of the Sugar manufacturing plant by the assessee can be classified as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944?
Excise Duty

Whether Iron and Steel structures manufactured and used captively in the factory for installation of the Sugar manufacturing plant by the assessee can be classified as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944?

TG Team15 years ago