Karnataka High Court held that during the pendency of proceedings u/s. 210 of the Companies Act, 2013, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) can be assigned with the investigation, u/s. 212 of the Companies Act.
Explore Karnataka HCs ruling on Section 148A(d) under IT Act in Vasanthi Ramdas Pai Vs ITO. Analysis covers reassessment proceedings, key arguments, and implications.
Karnataka High Court clarifies that holding shares in a subsidiary doesn’t constitute a ‘supply of service’ under GST, impacting the Yonex India case.
Karnataka High Court revolved around Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in case of Shashikala Jayaram vs. Appayappa – can cheque issued by spouse be prosecutable?
Karnataka High Court directs the Government to address petitioner’s representation on Section 80TTA limit by Jan 31. Analysis of Rupesh Srivastava Vs CBDT case and its impact.
Karnataka High Court held that incorrect claim or erroneous claim would not amount to willful evasion. Further, mere fact of not accurate tax, not exact tax or erroneous tax would not lead to the proceedings under Section 276 of the Income Tax Act.
Karnataka High Court ruling: Revenue cannot block Input Tax Credit (ITC) for more than one year. Details of S.P. Metals vs Asst. Commissioner of Central Tax case.
Karnataka High Court rules against income tax reassessment after 3 years. Case: Pramila Mahadev Tadkase Vs ITO. Details of the judgment and legal implications.
Karnataka High Court invalidates income tax assessment order citing incorrect email notices. Details of Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt Ltd Vs Assessment Unit case.
Read the Karnataka High Court judgment on Hatsoff Helicopter Training’s tax dispute. Exemption granted for non-furnishing GSTIN. Get insights on the case.
